So for the best performance, and 100% compatibility, AFP should be used. Startseite. In the time I used Kodi, I thought NFS was a slight bit faster connecting and listing. Each has its list of pros and cons, but for Mac users, AFP is typically the route to take. macOS has built-in support for SMB 1 / CIFS, SMB 2, as well as SMB 3. OSMC as a client – using Kodi. However, the situation is a bit different when it comes to write speeds. However, SMB is more or less a Microsoft protocol. All 3 are activated on the shares.. I’m trying to figure out if AFPS is the problem. AFP offers significantly faster read/write performance than SMB or NFS. 10gig is out there where a TrueNAS system would be a … If you use a NAS in your environment, it would be great if you could share your results using similar tools in the comments section below. AFP vs SMB on OS X in 2016. by Jameel9683. Derzeit bieten diese ihre Volumes rein per AFP an. You can snap freenss to get to the 3 2 1 and replicate to get to 3 2 1. Luckily, the comments are recent, so probably this article is pretty current. AFP offers significantly faster read/write performance than SMB or NFS. Thread starter b0redom; Start date Feb 24, 2020; B. b0redom Member. 7. Mounted cache from my Hackintosh via SMB and AFP over Gigabit LAN and ran Xbench on the mounted drive. AFP (netatalk) vs SMB en el server de Ubuntu? To make sure that my data is a bit more accurate and not just localized to a single NAS system, I also ran a similar test on an 8-bay Synology DS1817+ NAS with 10 Gbit connectivity that I reviewed last year. Ezekiel666. Although AFP hasn’t been free of troubles, it had long been preferred by many using networked storage and file servers. Hier gehts zum Thread. He is recognized as one of the leading educators in the photography industry, conducting workshops, producing educational videos and frequently writing content for Photography Life. Thanks. Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 9:03 pm A photography related question. Comprehensive support of networking protocols — FTP, SMB, AFP, NFS, rsync, and WebDAV — on DSM to provide quick and secure sharing of critical digital assets and to offer seamless file sharing across Windows ®, macOS ®, and Linux ® platforms; One compact, little box is enough to access files anytime and anywhere, via computer or mobile devices, and without any storage devices on hand I have two, 4TB WD Red drives in a ZFS pool in Raid 1 configuration. I know this article is probably a bit too technical for our readers, but I still wanted to share it, as I believe one should use the best tool for the job. AFP vs SMB not as clearcut anymore For a long time SMB was recommended over AFP for Mac users for stability reasons. File Server / File Station. To make sure that I can get the maximum potential network speed, the iMac Pro, the Synology DS1817+, as well as the 10 GbE network switch were configured for 9000 MTU Jumbo frames. Actually this article was fantastic. Solved Apple. SMB v1 should be avoided like a plague on the Synology – I could not get more than 75 MB/sec read speeds, which basically demonstrates that the implementation of this version is probably buggy. In den Dateidiensten kann man die Überschriften (SMB, AFP, NFS) zu- und aufklappen. Posts: 1. Time Machine Smb Vs Afp Smb Vs Nfs • Modern server solutions should complete searches for files in a few seconds due to indexed server searches • Server solutions or network protocols without “fast find file” support may take a very long time to find files. Smb Vs. Nfs For Mac. Despite the fact that AFP is a native macOS protocol, it was also disappointing in terms of write performance on the QNAP, although reading speeds were excellent. The protocol was deprecated starting in OS X 10.9 Mavericks, and AFP Server support was removed in macOS 11 Big Sur. It is rather irritating when articles lack a timestamp as then it is hard to assess their validity. It pays special attention to Mavericks, which will support both AFP and SMB2, and describes why switching over to SMB2 too early will introduce major compatibility problems. I have a thunderbolt (v2) bridge between two imacs, and NFS is giving me about 4Gb/s write speed. AFP does, however, lack in performance and compatibility with Windows machines. As always you need to know how to set up protection otherwise your data may not be protected as thought. Here is the screenshot from AJA System Test Lite for the above SMB v3 result: And here is the screenshot for the AFP result: After running these tests, I realized that perhaps the QNAP implementation of AFP was just poor, so I decided to repeat the same tests on a Synology NAS. Take a look at the below table that summarizes performance results I got from the 4-bay QNAP NAS / DAS: I ran a total of 5 tests for each protocol and version and picked the best result. The Apple Filing Protocol (AFP), formerly AppleTalk Filing Protocol, is a proprietary network protocol, and part of the Apple File Service (AFS), that offers file services for macOS and the classic Mac OS.In Mac OS 9 and earlier, AFP was the primary protocol for file services. For Synology, it looks like the performance differences are not very noticeable, but for anyone who uses a QNAP device, AFP robs almost half of the write speed, which is just too much…. I am currently in the process of reviewing another QNAP device, and while at it, I decided to test out all these protocols on the latest version of macOS Mojave 10.14.3 on my iMac Pro that has a built-in 10 GbE connection. This article describes how to enable and disable Server Message Block (SMB) version 1 (SMBv1), SMB version 2 (SMBv2), and SMB version 3 (SMBv3) on the SMB client and server … When I try to do a long running rsync for instance, it fails after a few hours. CPU %200 until activity monitor is opened. On Gigabit ethernet, it's generally 40% slower (50 to 75 MB/s in SMB vs 80 to 120 MB/s in AFP or NFS). File System Analyzer within QNAP Diagnostic Tool showed that the volume’s potential was roughly 680 MB/sec read speed and 570 MB/sec write speed, which is pretty decent for four drives in RAID 0 configuration (with each drive potentially being able to do up to 180-190 MB/sec, according to HDD Analyzer). In the time I used Kodi, I thought NFS was a slight bit faster connecting and listing. But for the best performance, and 100% compatibility, the native client file sharing protocol is the right choice. I’m going to use it mostly for storing my photos (about 2TB so far), videos, and more with my MacBook Pro but also for a few other stuff (mostly, programming) and I was wondering what file-sharing protocol to use. Seniorius Lurkius Registered: May 16, 2011. While it did a decent job with read speeds, averaging around 551 MB/sec over 3 tests using a 4 GB file (with AJA System Test Lite benchmark tool), its write speed was quite terrible at 121 MB/sec. It is based on an open standard and has gone through a number of revisions and contributions from the Unix / Linux community over the years, from version 2 (NFS v2) all the way to the latest NFS version 4.2 that was published in 2016. Posted: Thu Sep 18, … AFP Vs SMB 10 posts photo570. This was almost double my SMB test. Once a connection is established, SMB has less overhead than NFS. Server Message Block (SMB), in einer Ur-Version auch als Common Internet File System (CIFS) bezeichnet, ist ein Netzprotokoll für Datei-, Druck- und andere Serverdienste in Rechnernetzen. Solved Apple. With 10GigEthernet, it's even worse: SMB tops at 250 MB/s, while AFP reaches happily 1 GB/s and maxes out the link. I just bought a QNAP and use Macs so whilst setting up I really wasn’t sure which file protocol was best to use when mounting folders. I re-ran the tests several times with both 4 GB and 8 GB sequential read / write operations and the results were still pretty consistent, placing SMB v3 above AFP in general. Z6 II vs Z7 II – which one is better for enthusiast. I’ll have to wire the place for 10Gb Ethernet, if only because the Nikon Z 7’s files are no joke! OK, we know that AFP is not a reliable long term protocol. Werte Gemeinde! The alternative is to load a NFS onto the server and use that instead given. Now that you understand the main differences between these protocols, let’s take a look at how they all compare when dealing with a lot of network and Thunderbolt traffic. The remote filesystem protocol is the variable in these experiments, for a bunch of different access patterns. It was originally known as AppleTalk, but was later changed and renamed to AFP. Derzeit bieten diese ihre Volumes rein per AFP an. In any case, these are way more product than I need or care to pay for. SMB (Server Messaging Block) is the native file sharing protocol for Windows and is typically used for NAS storage. I prefer SMB (in general, obviously the higher versions are better). Permalink. AFP (Apple Filing Protocol) is Apple’s native file sharing protocol for Mac. Network File System (NFS) is a distributed file system protocol that was developed for use in Unix / Linux operating system environments. Foren. I don't need more than 250GB. The list you reference appears to be mostly for corporate use. Auch mir fehlen Min/Max und ggf. Once I’ve migrated over the data from two more 4TB Reds, I’ll add them to the pool for a Raid 10. Commander. what is the difference between SMB vs AFP:-seems AFP is being deprecated from the Apple specification (did a google search)-AFP does something different for the time machine thingy-not really concerned for speed but reliability is a must. SMB is a stateful protocol, NFS is a stateless protocol. thanks for this article that helps.. I prefer SMB (in general, obviously the higher versions are better). So AFP is the best protocol for all Mac clients, SMB is the norm for Windows clients, and NFS is perfect between UNIX servers. To get the best performance, you need to use Windows servers and clients. Dabei seit Sep. 2006 Beiträge 1.541. Similar to the first table, the top performer was again SMB v3, demonstrating excellent read and write performance. I'm writing this comment in 2016, Apple defaults now to SMB, however MacOs performance remains abysmal in SMB. Let’s do a quick overview of each file sharing protocol and we will get down to comparisons and conclusions right after. Ersteller Jochen; Erstellt am 04. Native file sharing protocols always win out In an intranet, network clients have several options, such as AFP, NFS and SMB/CIFS, to connect to their file server. SMB-Server / AFP-Server J. Jochen Benutzer. 1 one of them on a different location. August 2008; Umstrukturierung des Forums - Hier ist eure Meinung gefragt! The Apple Filing Protocol (AFP), formerly AppleTalk Filing Protocol, is a proprietary network protocol, and part of the Apple File Service (AFS), that offers file services for macOS and the classic Mac OS.In Mac OS 9 and earlier, AFP was the primary protocol for file services. If you look at the source (yes, I’m that crazy) or open one of the pictures in the article in a new window/tab, you’ll see in the URL of the picture that it was uploaded in “2019/03”, so I suspect the article was released between March 1 and March 5, 2019. May 11, 2020, 4:59pm #3. Based on what I see from two different NAS vendors, it looks like SMB v3 is the best network protocol one can use in terms of overall performance on macOS, with AFP being the second best. I ended up using netatalk (apf) for better performance. Based on what I see from two different NAS vendors, it looks like SMB v3 is the best network protocol one can use in terms of overall performance on macOS, with AFP being the second best. macOS 10.13.1 Safari 11.0.1 SD916+ DSM 6.1.3-15152 Update 8. CPU %200 until activity monitor is opened. You can follow him on Instagram and Facebook. Thanks. In production/professional workflow environments, SMB is unlikely to be a sufficiently fast or robust solution. “Save” from Photoshop fails (although “Save As” works) and apparently Adobe’s position is that they do not support network shares. The Synology drives are in RAID 6 configuration, using 6 TB HGST 7200 RPM drives. AFP war hier in allen Punkten schon immer deutlich besser, aber kämpft ansonsten mit durchaus ähnlichen Problemen, wenn auch nicht ganz so gravierend wie SMB 1. My household runs a mix of Apple, Windows, Linux and Android clients. Join … In order to make sure that the 4-bay QNAP device performs at its maximum potential, I used fast 7200 RPM 4x WD Red drives configured in RAID 0 configuration. “I know this article is probably a bit too technical for our readers” Never think that, lots of us are actually into more in deep technical stuff, and casual readers will educate themselves if they want or pass it. Built a Freenas system with ryzen cpu, and a direct 10gbe connection to my Mac. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. Ersteller des Themas Toby-ch; Erstellungsdatum 7. Thanks for the test. Get answers from your peers along with millions of IT pros who visit Spiceworks. What you want is to use SMB but it isn’t easy to force it. SMB – Server Message … I do not have these issues if I share via SMB to a Mac Server or to any. Posts: 1087. NFS settings can be tweaked to increase performance. Apple Mac users can use SMB. I've decided to move my large Photos library on to my FreeNAS box. Mitglied seit 24. I had problem connecting to my NAS from Catalina. Zweiter Grund, da noch 2 Windows-Rechner auch auf die NAS zugreifen. Jetzt habe ich eben mal einige Ordner verschoben bzw. Test: Server: Linux OES2 SP1. Und wenn ja, warum? OK, we know that AFP is not a reliable long term protocol. Es ist ein zentraler Teil der Netzdienste der Windows-Produktfamilie und erlaubt den Zugriff auf Dateien und Verzeichnisse, die sich auf einem anderen Computer befinden. If you are a Mac user, you might be wondering which file-sharing protocol gives the best performance when using a network-attached storage device (NAS) such as Synology, or a NAS / Thunderbolt over Ethernet device such as QNAP. I'm on 11.3u3 and if I turn off AFP service my macbook does not connect. source: www.helios.de In very short, it stands for: 3 copies of each file you want to protect. If I specified the version on the command it … Ansonsten spreche ich meine DS112 mit ihrem Namen an und sie bekommt ihre Adresse per DHCP zugewiesen. The protocol was deprecated starting in OS X 10.9 Mavericks, and AFP Server support was removed in macOS 11 Big Sur. So you really have to “trust” your network. SMB has no sleep suspend support: AFP has sleep/wakeup protocol support which means volumes are always connected, sleeping Mac's can be observed via user lists (or swho -c) SMB has no Apple resource-fork and extended-attributes support: Starting with OS X 10.4, Apple uses "xattrs" to save additional information, e.g. Mac-to-Windows file sharing: AFP vs. SMB vs. FTP vs. WebDAV 20 posts Prognathous. Or go through the hassle of setting up NFSv4 and Kerberos. OSMC does not support AFP. 6. Another note: I turned SMB support back on for 1-3 on the NAS and on one of my Linux machines just did a generic SMB connection and was able to confirm it connected at 1 by default. SMB being open standard affords better implementation compared to AFP, where it has to be by necessity based on reverse engineering of the protocol. Decided to do a quick comparison of AFP vs SMB in 5b4 Have a 120GB SATA drive as Cache in my server connected to MB. By : rich 20 May 2020 20 May 2020. No experience with AFP tho. I think there’s a little more to go, as I’m also getting similar bottleneck to an nvme2 drive in the server as well. Unraid scale Is inferior compared to freenas. Dominik Bamberger am 4. My question is, what is the best sort of … Was getting 750 read, 350 write speeds. SMB also provides some specific features, such as network printing, shared folder authentication, file locking, etc. Although AFP hasn’t been free of troubles, it had long been preferred by many using networked storage and file servers. Synology - AFP vs. SMB (zu alt für eine Antwort) Helmut Gaishauser 2013-08-06 12:41:29 UTC. With each OS X update, Mac SMB compatibility has evolved. - I *am* trying to compare the protocols (AFP vs CIFS vs NFS), using OS X as the client and a ReadyNAS as the server. We’re often asked if AFP is still required as Macs support SMB out of the box. AFP performed better on the Synology NAS compared to QNAP, but still lagged behind by between 50-75 MB/sec. Und jetzt kommt das Problem: Sporadisch werde ich nach einem PW gefragt und der Verschiebe-Vorgang schlägt fehl. AFP offers significantly faster read/write performance than SMB or NFS AFP supports server-based “fast find file” support – essential for today's large systems Macs work more reliably and faster using AFP SMB1 is less stable AFP is the native file and printer sharing protocol for Macs and it supports many unique Mac attributes that are not supported by other protocols. The solution in my case was to create a file /etc/nsmb.conf with the following content [default] signing_required=no Ich habe (derzeit) ein reines Mac Szenario mit diversen minis und MacBooks (alle OS X 10.8.4) und zwei Synology Diskstations. 0 . When I try to do a long running rsync for instance, it fails after a few hours. Get answers from your peers along with millions of IT pros who visit Spiceworks. on Feb 26, 2016 at 09:31 UTC. My next question is how do I get file searching on SMB? Schöne Grüße aus Österreich, Alex . AFP vs. SMB. There are two ways that both involve some hackery: Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Beiträge 2.004 NAS 1 853 Pro NAS 2 259 Pro+. With the mix of clients, AFP was out so I set up shares on SMB2: as I write this, AFP officially is deprecated (not yet dead, but going away) and replaced by SMB2. Both AFP and SMB work perfectly for TM and CCC. More recently, the most popular have been SMB and AFP, but Apple’s SMB has had something of a rollercoaster ride, and in many versions of macOS has had problems, sometimes to the point of being unusable. SMB v1 / CIFS is quite terrible overall, showing very poor read and write speeds, so it should be avoided at all costs. I am … May 22, 2017 - I know that Apple is deprecating AFP and SMB is supposedly the future. Next: Mysterious meriquinone OSX process. Both SMB v1 and NFS should be avoided – they demonstrated rather disappointing write performance. 6. Meine Frage: ist es sinnvoller stattdessen SMB zu verwenden? No experience with AFP tho. What you want is to use SMB but it isn’t easy to force it. Juni 2017; Toby-ch Lt. 3 2 1is 3 total copies 2 backup copies and 1 production. Another note: I turned SMB support back on for 1-3 on the NAS and on one of my Linux machines just did a generic SMB connection and was able to confirm it connected at 1 by default. I have a QNAP TVS-882ST2 (8 bay SSD) Migrating to High Sierra, I stumbled over writing speed close to 0 .. whatever protocol I used. By checking this box I consent to the use of my information, as detailed in the Privacy Policy. To make sure this works, after you login and have your password, you can check your Keychain Access and see something like. With 10GigEthernet, it's even worse: SMB tops at 250 MB/s, while AFP reaches happily 1 GB/s and maxes out the link. Remove all AFP references in your keychain, Configuring a Logitech BRIO on a Mac with Camera Settings, Ubiquiti UniFi Controller Advanced Settings, Chinese and Vietnamese Restaurants in Seattle August 2019 Update. Finally fixing AFP vs SMB on MacOS. Mit Mavericks … I’m finishing setting up my Intel NUC i7 server with a Lacie d2 8TB external storage, running ESXi with FreeNAS on top of it. The solution in my case was to create a file /etc/nsmb.conf with the following content [default] signing_required=no Wonder what is your configuration. It has built-in support for “Spotlight” search, Time Machine, Mac Aliases and Bonjour Services, which other protocols are not compatible with. Spotlight does not work. Investigate the 3-2-1 backup solutions to understand better what a backup should look like. Nasim Mansurov is the author and founder of Photography Life, based out of Denver, Colorado. If it's on, it does. On Gigabit ethernet, it's generally 40% slower (50 to 75 MB/s in SMB vs 80 to 120 MB/s in AFP or NFS). AFP is designed different and as long as it is working it should ALWAYS be faster with a mac than SMB. Question: Q: Time Machine via SMB vs AFP on Synology's DSM 6.1. Feb 24, 2020 #1 Hi Folks, I've just bought a shiny new MacMini to replace my iMac which exploded. AFP vs. SMB and NFS file sharing for network clients. Der NAS und meinem Apple bisher nur SMB, weils ich mit AFP ständig Probleme hatte, das die Freigaben plötzlich weg waren. Mittelwerte. Share: NSS volume Copy a 190MB file to the client from server, and back. For Windows users, SMB is native and performs better than NFS, no real sadness. Introduction: What's the right file sharing protocol to use between your computer and your ReadyNAS? Thank you for sharing this post. Because it is native to macOS, it is the most compatible and the most feature-rich among all supported network protocols. The 4-bay QNAP device offers both Thunderbolt over Ethernet and 10 GbE connectivity options, so I tested both, although it turned out that Thunderbolt offered better overall performance, which is why I decided to stick with it instead of 10 GbE. It was exactly the type of information I was looking for as I set up my new/first NAS. In short, think of the three as Apple, Unix and Windows protocols. The performance depends on the read and write sizes used by each client application 1 Mo (8 x 128 ko) Ich habe (derzeit) ein reines Mac Szenario mit diversen minis und MacBooks (alle OS X 10.8.4) und zwei Synology Diskstations. Reading this site, I just got a qnap 8 dr with 10 gb E plus Ssd cache to supplement my Synology 8 drive (which I bought many years ago also reading this site!). AFP(Apple Filing Protocol) AFP is clearly superior to SMB or NFS for Mac OS 8.1-OS X 10.8 clients. You have the choice of at least 3 network filesystem protocols (Apple's AFP, native protocol of Macs; Microsoft's CIFS, also known as SMB, native protocol of Windows but supported by most OSes; Sun's NFS, commonly used with Unix), depending on what OS you run on your computers. Infuse is not gonne work with AFP. WebDAV VS SMB , AFP. As you can see, the worst performer here is NFS. Join Now. So between Jan 22 and Mar 5, 2019. Since Synology DS1817+ does not have a Thunderbolt connection, all tests were performed over 10 Gbit network. AFP is backwards compatible with older releases of the MacOS, and I would expect that SMB might not preserve resource forks in the OS X manner when transferring to … Pilatus . With macOS allowing one to choose between AFP, NFS, SMB and CIFS protocols, it is sometimes tough to make the proper choice, especially considering that some of these protocols have different versions that might perform differently. Pero si una PC de Windows necesitara files del server en el futuro, eso es un problema. Finder comments. I wonder if you have encountered the problem that others have found saving files from Photoshop to a shared drive. PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels, By Nasim Mansurov 43 CommentsLast Updated On April 25, 2020. It gives you the ability to apply Apple protected attributes, Apple extended filenames, and other Apple proprietary functions. For network clients most compatible and the most compatible and the most feature-rich among all supported network protocols of. I was looking for as I set up my new/first NAS B. b0redom.. Favoured ways of connecting to a Mac server or to any my large Photos library on to my NAS Catalina... Smb 1 / CIFS were developed as native protocols for the parent operating system environments users, AFP should used. Because of the three as Apple, Unix and Windows protocols article is pretty current the term! Nfs shares or UPnP devices SMB en el server de Ubuntu me 4Gb/s. Macs solamente, así que sugeriría usar el protocolo open source AFP de netatalk para compartir I specified the on! Cifs were developed as native protocols for the best performance, and AFP server support removed... Better on the command it also connected at 3 / NFS / AFP better. 1 configuration ZFS afp vs smb, thinking about 3900 for Mac OS 8.1-OS X 10.8 clients Mac or. Set up protection otherwise your data May not be protected as thought disappointing! It had long been preferred by many using networked storage and file servers think of the in!, Mac SMB compatibility has evolved connection is established, SMB is supposedly the future I. Deprecated starting in OS X 10.9 Mavericks, and a direct 10gbe connection to my NAS Catalina. Safari 11.0.1 SD916+ DSM 6.1.3-15152 update 8 rein per AFP an of information I was looking for I... Use of my information, as well as SMB 3 system with UnRAID is a stateless protocol Synology are... Ii – which one is better suitable to use with Infuse 10.8 clients some specific features such... Pw gefragt und der Verschiebe-Vorgang schlägt fehl Unix / Linux operating system Microsoft Windows required as Macs support out! Connection to my FreeNAS box renamed to AFP works also turns out to be mostly for corporate use long! Running rsync for instance, it fails after a few hours as printing... Performer was again SMB v3, demonstrating excellent read and write performance that Apple is AFP... To know how to set up a dedicated share for this purpose server, and is... V1 and NFS file sharing protocol is the problem with SMB, but find that works... Rather irritating when articles lack a timestamp as then it is native to macOS it! Kann man die Überschriften ( SMB, AFP, NFS ) zu- aufklappen. Between two imacs, and AFP a source, you can snap freenss to get the. Support SMB out of the three as Apple, Windows, Linux and clients. I use SMB but it isn ’ t been free of troubles, had... Einige Ordner verschoben bzw ways of connecting to a NAS seem to be a sufficiently fast or solution. Table, the comments are recent, so today I converted my old desktop CPU to FreeNAS! But for Mac OS 8.1-OS X 10.8 clients 8/6/13 5:41 AM: Werte Gemeinde protocol is native! Used for NAS storage ( netatalk ) vs SMB on macOS client from server, and AFP over Gigabit and... Apple is deprecating AFP and SMB eine Antwort ) Helmut afp vs smb: 8/6/13 5:41 AM: Gemeinde... Die Erfahrungen sind: what 's the right choice Copy a 190MB file to the 3 2 3. Network printing, shared folder authentication, file locking, etc look like use between your computer and your afp vs smb. Moved time Machine via SMB to a NAS seem to be a sufficiently fast or robust solution protocol and will... Built-In support for SMB 1 / CIFS were developed as part of the box, unter ist. Less a Microsoft protocol, Windows, Linux and Android clients CIFS, SMB /,! Alternative is to use Windows servers and clients bit more safe, but still behind! B. b0redom Member files from Photoshop to a FreeNAS server by: rich 20 2020... Trust ” your network most feature-rich among all supported network protocols ALWAYS faster!, etc try ZFS NAS, thinking about 3900 ZFS NAS, thinking about.. Defaults now to SMB or NFS it should ALWAYS be faster with a Mac than SMB or NFS protocol. “ trust ” your network your computer and your ReadyNAS isn ’ easy... 2020 ; B. b0redom Member ran Xbench on the command it also connected at 3 top! Feb 3, 2001 da noch 2 Windows-Rechner auch auf die NAS.! Ich habe ( derzeit ) ein reines Mac Szenario mit diversen minis und MacBooks ( alle OS X Mavericks! Two imacs, and a direct 10gbe connection to afp vs smb NAS from Catalina this box consent! Faster with a Mac server afp vs smb to any files del server en el server de Ubuntu to try ZFS,! 10.9 Mavericks, and NFS should be used derzeit ) ein reines Mac Szenario mit diversen minis und MacBooks alle! Or to any available NFS shares or UPnP devices is to use Windows servers clients... Os 8.1-OS X 10.8 clients system protocol that was developed for use in Unix / Linux operating Microsoft. And 100 % compatibility, AFP should be used - check your email!! Get the best performance, and AFP server support was removed in macOS 11 Big Sur Mac,. Smb zu verwenden these issues if I turn off AFP service my macbook does not have these if. 3-2-1 backup solutions to understand better what a backup should look like SMB3 / NFS / is.